What's the best way to convert a list/tuple into a dict where the keys are the distinct values of the list and the values are the the frequencies of those distinct values?
In other words:
['a', 'b', 'b', 'a', 'b', 'c']
-->
{'a': 2, 'b': 3, 'c': 1}
(I've had to do something like the above so many times, is there anything in the standard lib that does it for you?)
EDIT:
Jacob Gabrielson points out there is something coming in the standard lib for the 2.7/3.1 branch
-
Kind of
from collections import defaultdict fq= defaultdict( int ) for w in words: fq[w] += 1That usually works nicely.
-
I have to share an interesting but kind of ridiculous way of doing it that I just came up with:
>>> class myfreq(dict): ... def __init__(self, arr): ... for k in arr: ... self[k] = 1 ... def __setitem__(self, k, v): ... dict.__setitem__(self, k, self.get(k, 0) + v) ... >>> myfreq(['a', 'b', 'b', 'a', 'b', 'c']) {'a': 2, 'c': 1, 'b': 3}John Fouhy : (self.get(k) or 0) can be better written as self.get(k, 0) -
This is an abomination, but:
from itertools import groupby dict((k, len(list(xs))) for k, xs in groupby(sorted(items)))I can't think of a reason one would choose this method over S.Lott's, but if someone's going to point it out, it might as well be me. :)
ʞɔıu : points for cleverness -
I find that the easiest to understand (while might not be the most efficient) way is to do:
{i:words.count(i) for i in set(words)}S.Lott : +1: Got to get me some of that Python 3.0 syntactic sugar.Trey Stout : That is pretty hotNathan Ross Powell : Beautiful Python! -
Just a note that, starting with Python 2.7/3.1, this functionality will be built in to the
collectionsmodule, see this bug for more information. Here's the example from the release notes:>>> from collections import Counter >>> c=Counter() >>> for letter in 'here is a sample of english text': ... c[letter] += 1 ... >>> c Counter({' ': 6, 'e': 5, 's': 3, 'a': 2, 'i': 2, 'h': 2, 'l': 2, 't': 2, 'g': 1, 'f': 1, 'm': 1, 'o': 1, 'n': 1, 'p': 1, 'r': 1, 'x': 1}) >>> c['e'] 5 >>> c['z'] 0ʞɔıu : looks even simpler than that, looks like you can just pass the string to the Counter constructor and it does it for you
0 comments:
Post a Comment