I would like to create a rectangular 'flat 3D' look for one of my control templates. In it's most simple version this means having a line at the bottom that is darker than that at the top, and maybe some variation between the left and right lines too.
A more complex version would allow me to provide on or more brushes so that gradients could be applied.
The default <Border>
element in WPF lets you specify a different thickness per edge, but I can't find a way to specify multiple brushes.
So, how can I produce the effect I want as simply as possible?
EDIT it's been suggested that I post an example of how I want to use this. Personally I'd be happy to have a style or a user control. The user control might be used thus:
<FourSidedBorder LeftSideBrush="#00f" RightSideBrush="#0f0" ... />
Or perhaps even simpler:
<FourSidedBorder BorderBrush="#00f,#0f0,#f00,#fff"
BorderThickness="1,2,3,4" ... />
These are just ideas. Any sensible, concise solution is welcome.
-
Honestly probably the easiest way would be to use layering techniques. For instance create a grid like this:
<Grid Width="50" Height="50"> <Grid.RowDefinitions> <RowDefinition Height="Auto" /> <RowDefinition Height="*" /> <RowDefinition Height="Auto" /> </Grid.RowDefinitions> <Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" /> <ColumnDefinition Width="*" /> <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto" /> </Grid.ColumnDefinitions> <!-- Top Border --> <Border Height="3" Background="LightGray" Grid.Column="0" Grid.Row="0" Grid.ColumnSpan="2" /> <!-- Right Border --> <Border Width="3" Background="DarkGray" Grid.Column="2" Grid.Row="0" Grid.RowSpan="3" /> <!-- Content --> <Border Background="Gray" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="1" /> <!-- Left Border --> <Border Width="3" Background="LightGray" Grid.Row="1" Grid.Column="0" Grid.RowSpan="2" /> <!-- Bottom Border --> <Border Height="3" Background="DarkGray" Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="1" /> </Grid>
I think you get the idea. This is probably the easiest way of doing it. You could set this up as a template and use it like this:
<Template x:Key="My3DBorder" TargetType="ContentControl"> <!-- Put the Grid definition in here from above --> </Template> <ContentControl Template="{StaticResource My3dBorder}"> <!-- My Content Goes Here --> </ContentControl>
Nir : Its probably better to do this with Line elements and and not 4 BordersDrew Noakes : This really isn't very concise. I'm hoping there's a better, simpler way of doing this, even after replacing borders with lines.Micah : I'm not sure how much simpler it can be. How about you post an example of how you want to use it, and we'll work backwards from there.Bryan Anderson : Throw it into a user control and it will be really simple to use.Drew Noakes : Imagine I wanted to have several of these in my UI. Laying this XAML around every instance would really obscure the logical tree. How could this visual tree specification be separated? -
Here is a solution I devised that achieves most of what I want. It doesn't give complete control over all four sides independently, but it does give the rectangular flat 3D view that I want.
Here's how it looks:
Paste this into Kaxaml to see it for yourself:
<Page xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation" xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml" Background="#CCC"> <Page.Resources> <!-- A brush for flat 3D panel borders --> <LinearGradientBrush x:Key="Flat3DBorderBrush" StartPoint="0.499,0" EndPoint="0.501,1"> <GradientStop Color="#FFF" Offset="0" /> <GradientStop Color="#DDD" Offset="0.01" /> <GradientStop Color="#AAA" Offset="0.99" /> <GradientStop Color="#888" Offset="1" /> </LinearGradientBrush> </Page.Resources> <Grid> <!-- A flat 3D panel --> <Border HorizontalAlignment="Center" VerticalAlignment="Center" BorderBrush="{StaticResource Flat3DBorderBrush}" BorderThickness="1" Background="#BBB"> <!-- some content here --> <Control Width="100" Height="100"/> </Border> </Grid> </Page>
Hope that helps someone else out. I'm still on the lookout for innovative solutions to this problem, so keep posting and I'll accept a better answer than this one.
0 comments:
Post a Comment